Gatt still exists as the WTO Framework Agreement for Trade in Goods, updated following the Uruguay Round negotiations (a distinction is made between GATT 1994, the updated parts of GATT, and GATT 1947, the original agreement which remains at the heart of GATT 1994).  However, GATT 1994 is not the only legally binding agreement enshrined in the Marrakesh Final Act. a long list of about sixty agreements, annexes, decisions and agreements was adopted. The agreements are divided into six main parts: Karl Sauvant of Columbia University, an advocate of international investment rules, stressed the need for capacity building; He rightly stressed the importance of providing technical assistance for capacity building so that developing countries could participate fully in the negotiation and implementation of an agreement to facilitate investment.56 The new work programme included negotiations and other work on non-agricultural tariffs, trade and environment, WTO anti-dumping and subsidy rules, trade facilitation, transparency in government procurement, intellectual property and a number of issues raised by developing countries as difficulties in the implementation of WTO agreements. At regular intervals, Congress also has the opportunity to vote in favour of withdrawal from the WTO. Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (P.L. 103-465), the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is required to submit a report to Congress every five years analyzing the costs and benefits of continued U.S. participation in the WTO.
Once the Congress has received this full report, each member of the Congress may present a joint resolution revusing the approval of the WTO agreement by the Congress.